Wenzhou shoe industry in Taiwan has been registered by the five trade marks
A man surnamed Huang in Taiwan registered by a dozen well-known trademarks of the mainland
Recently, O'Conner, Joe resistance, flying ostrich, Lulu Shun, Australia and London and other shoe company has received five Urban Trademark Office a written notice, surnamed Huang said Taiwan has registered by their trademark registered in Taiwan trademark logo logo exactly the same with their brand identity, such as Lulu Shun and Joe trademarks and temperature resistance of the same enterprise, and flying ostrich just "flying ostrich" to "Huan bird", the same ostrich pattern.
Wenzhou Trademark Office, according to the International Registration of the Department of Ren Zhouguang described the man surnamed Huang in the last year in China registered by a dozen brands, caused many companies to play with his trademark lawsuit. Zhou said that for five of Wenzhou shoe enterprises registered by the trademarks, trade range of trademark law in the 18 classes and 25 classes, mostly for handbags, luggage and other leather products. Trademarks of their registered by many well-known brands to the mainland, there is considerable market value, registered by people suspected to pursue the interests of others suspected of the brand, while the person is registered by volume, there are malicious acts of cybersquatting. Therefore, this office recommends several Wenzhou shoe enterprises in accordance with law, for the removal of applications.
Different between trademark law, Joe calls several shoe joint resistance
Aokang Trademark Rights for Liu Ting said Aokang learned early, it was registered in Taiwan, with exactly the same Sheung Fung Aokang birds logo, trade name for O'Conner. At that time, much of the world are Aokang registered "Aokang" trademark, and did not enter the Taiwan market at that time, so no rush to deal with the matter, it has launched a preliminary investigation.
Lu Lushun to the City Trademark Office recently made a request to withdraw the Taiwan trademark. Flying ostrich, Joe said resistance to a trademark application for withdrawal of malicious cybersquatting. But in addition to a successful grasp Aokang said, the shoe enterprises are worried about a few issues, namely mainland China and Taiwan there are different rules for trademark protection, if the removal of the comments should be trademarks of the Taiwan authorities to verify, do not meet the local provides little chance of winning.
Joe resistant chairman Pan Zhicheng said that they started a few months ago about the incident, and certain intellectual property and Fujian had intervened on their behalf, to apply to withdraw the case registered by trademark, but because there two different sets of two Trademark Law, and the power of individual enterprise thin, so things have been outstanding, he hoped that a few malicious cybersquatting of Wenzhou shoe enterprises to join hands for annulment of a trademark cybersquatting.
Five enterprises, but also on the matter to the "wait and see" attitude of the Australian general manager Yao Chaojun London said they had been alerted, and Taiwan for some representations, but because in two different places, going to court is too much trouble. Huang, trademark registered by the people of Taiwan, is nothing more than to drill for legal loopholes, to earn fees by selling trademark only if he produced a few years if not its trade mark registered by the trademark of the still will lose the protection they being not too much action.
Taiwan trademark law in terms of the protection of famous trademarks
Zhou said the city a number of international trademark registration and protection of business sense is not strong, companies to "go out", should be noted that throughout the registration by, his own trademark protected. He also said that the matter can Taiwan's Trademark Law article 37, paragraph 7 (the same as or similar to another well-known trade mark or marks, that cause confusion in the public identify that danger may not apply for registration) and 14 ( first use the same or similar to others in the same goods or similar goods of the trademark, the applicant has a contract because of his human, geographic, or business relations, to know there are others, trade marks, shall not apply for trademark registration), assessment of applications for trademark .
Wenzhou Trademark Office proposed that the several companies to be responsible for managing the Taiwan Intellectual Property Trademark Office for the withdrawal of a trademark registered by malicious, and subject to punishment.
I am Mp3 Player Manufacturers writer, reports some information about swiss blue topaz pendant , necklace set wholesale.
Processing your request, Please wait....
