Lang: No comments on behalf of any class is a mirror
Raised in last year's big state-owned property rights reform discussion Lang, has taken up the "Hong Kong businessmen Rights" banner. This year in March, the two media in Hong Kong, Lang dished out 10 000 words on the book "called deputies proposal interests of Hong Kong businessmen?? On the establishment of Hong Kong people's rights and interests of the Fund's proposed investment." But then triggered a question: Lang in the end who speaks in for? Lang replied: "I am not in the endorsement of a particular class, my only purpose is to call for an impartial, systematic, rule of law environment."
Last year, Mr. Lang questioned the state-owned enterprises when the MBO, in the country drew a question: Lang in the end is speaking for whom, on behalf of whose interests? Even a domestic economists holds together to the same object? Xianping view. That debate the smoke had dispersed, I do not intend to further the debate on that field in the past to discuss right and wrong. However, when picking up again today, Lang, "Hong Kong businessmen Rights" banner, the same question came out, and Lang in the end is speaking for who?
Maybe we can alone Lang cited a few examples of violations of rights and interests of Hong Kong businessmen concluded: Lang is for those rights have been infringed businessmen talking. However, this seems to be a paradox, as we can not say that consumer association for the consumer rights protection is the same as for the consumer to speak the truth. Lang is not the Consumers Association of Hong Kong businessmen, businessmen are not consumers, simply because the infringement in violation of consumer rights, or infringes the rights of Hong Kong businessmen, the damage of the law, hurt the social equity. The consumer association or Lang's function is only that this phenomenon, righting this injustice, and nothing more.
As Lang said, I am not in the endorsement of a certain class. I absolutely believe that any one of the vested interests of a particular class or endorsement of economists, is not sufficient to generate social credibility. Maybe we can not judge from one thing to one person right and wrong is wrong, but I think, as any one of the general public, all have the ability to make common sense.
Contrast, for the endorsement of the question for whom Lang gives me great interest: for a class economists must speak for it? For whom do speak for economists in the end? I think my current shallow knowledge, is clearly insufficient to give authoritative answers to these questions, but, as a sense of ordinary citizens with common sense, I feel the need to express their true thoughts.
We note that, when some new economic policies introduced, are always those we are familiar with an economist first come out of the policy to which class would benefit. Unfortunately, the controversy over these issues is not only based on the premise of academic dispute, but too many will join the class. For example once hugely controversial in the community point of view: we are poorer because you rich. This view to economic bloc in sharp differentiation occurs, a number of economists seems to be the spokesman for the rich.
Although personal point of view, I hope to have an economist who really grasp the voice of the people can speak for the interests of vulnerable groups, but the rich or powerful groups clearly have the resources to find more voice. Therefore, we can only hope the owner of the right words, economists can just stand on the position of interest succumb to authority and to promote social equity, social progress and speak up. This should not only look forward to good, but should reflect the academic conscience.
I think this sense, Lang "does not speak for any class" has become a mirror. For example, Mr. Lang pointed out that "the laws of the Mainland can be said that the basic sound, now the largest and most critical issue is arising in the implementation alienation." We should look at this issue rationally and to make good solution.
On the contrary, when Lang was raised in the end the question for whom endorsement, the question is in fact already have a certain class features become the voice of a particular class. This is truly deserves our vigilance?? When the voice fell into the hands of a few specific sectors of the voice, the range of social justice and legal progress, getting away.
Maybe we do not need to advocate, we really need is to hear the voice of the master who sent the voice of fairness and justice, perhaps the only way we can from a harmonious society closer
I am Quality Dress Products writer, reports some information about ceramic beverage dispenser , ge cooktop range.
Processing your request, Please wait....
