Meissner effect – CPR-1000 Current Probe Reader manufacturer – china CRS-TESTER
Explanation
A magnet levitating above a superconductor cooled by liquid nitrogen.
Floating magnet. The temperature is 4.2 K (a liquid helium cold bath). The bowl is made of lead, which is a superconductor at that temperature.
In a weak applied field, a superconductor “expels” all magnetic flux. It does this by setting up electric currents near its surface. It is the magnetic field of these surface currents that cancels out the applied magnetic field within the bulk of the superconductor. However, near the surface, within a distance called the London penetration depth, the magnetic field is not completely canceled; this region also contains the electric currents whose field cancels the applied magnetic field within the bulk. Each superconducting material has its own characteristic penetration depth. Because the field expulsion, or cancellation, does not change with time, the currents producing this effect (called persistent currents) do not decay with time. Therefore the conductivity can be thought of as infinite: a superconductor. Note that a perfect conductor will prevent any change to magnetic flux passing through its surface. This can be explained as ordinary electromagnetic induction and should be distinguished from the Meissner effect. The Meissner effect is the ejection of any magnetic field which occurs during the transition to the superconducting state. Its explanation is more complex and was first given in the London equations by the brothers Fritz and Heinz London.
Perfect diamagnetism
Superconductors in the Meissner state exhibit perfect diamagnetism, or superdiamagnetism, meaning that the total magnetic field B=0 within them. This means that their magnetic susceptibility, v = 1. Diamagnetism is defined as the generation of a spontaneous magnetization of a material which directly opposes the direction of an applied field. However, the fundamental origins of the diamagnetism in superconductors and normal materials are very different. In superconductors the diamagnetism arises from the persistent screening currents which flow to oppose the applied field; in normal materials diamagnetism arises as a direct result of an orbital rotation of electrons about the nuclei of an atom induced electromagnetically by the application of an applied field. Very recently, it has been shown theoretically that the Meissner effect may exhibit paramagnetism in some layered superconductors but so far this paramagnetic intrinsic Meissner effect has not been experimentally observed. Mario Rabinowitz and his colleagues showed that a virtual violation of the Meissner effect is possible.
Consequences
The discovery of the Meissner effect led to the phenomenological theory of superconductivity by Fritz and Heinz London in 1935. This theory explained resistanceless transport and the Meissner effect, and allowed the first theoretical predictions for superconductivity to be made. However, this theory only explained experimental observations – it did not allow the microscopic origins of the superconducting properties to be identified. Nevertheless, it became a requirement on all microscopic theories to be able to reproduce this effect. This was done successfully by the BCS theory in 1957. It should be noted, however, that the existing theory of the Meissner effect, which includes the phenomenological London’s theory, the microscopic BCS one, as well as the classical electrodynamics, is evidently far from completion. The problem is that the electromotive forces described by Faraday’s law of induction are equal to zero in stationary conditions of the Meissner effect, whereas the existing theory does not suggest any other electric forces needed to accelerate the electrons until the steady state supercurrent described by the London equation is achieved. Obviously, this acceleration can not be instantaneous for a macroscopic observer, because it would violate the causality principle. The problem was analysed in , where a model of the transient supercurrent is suggested. It is based on Cooper pairs as bosons with zero spin and coincides with the London equation asymptotically. However, it requires some arguable extensions of Maxwell-Lorentz electrodynamics.
A tin cylindern a Dewar flask filled with liquid heliumas been placed between the poles of an electromagnet. The magnetic field is about 8 milliteslas (80 G).
T=4.2 K, B=8 mT (80 G). Tin is in the normally conducting state. The compass needles indicate that magnetic flux permeates the cylinder.
The cylinder has been cooled from 4.2 K to 1.6 K. The current in the electromagnet has been kept constant, but the tin became superconducting at about 3 K. Magnetic flux has been expelled from the cylinder (the Meissner effect).
Paradigm for the Higgs mechanism
The Meissner effect of superconductivity serves as an important paradigm for the generation mechanism of a mass M (i.e. a reciprocal range, M: = h / (Mc) where h is Planck constant and c is speed of light) for a gauge field. In fact, this analogy is an abelian example for the Higgs mechanism, through which in high-energy physics the masses of the electroweak gauge particles, W and Z are generated. The length M is identical with “London’s penetration depth” in the theory of superconductivity.
Observation
Before the discovery of high-temperature superconductivity, observation of the Meissner effect was difficult, because the applied fields had to be relatively small (the measurements need to be made far from the phase boundary). But with yttrium barium copper oxide, the effect can be demonstrated using liquid nitrogen. Permanent magnets can be made to levitate.
See also
Physics portal
Science portal
Superfluid
London equations
References
^ Meissner, W.; R. Ochsenfeld (1933). “Ein neuer effekt bei eintritt der supraleitfhigkeit”. Naturwissenschaften 21 (44): 787788. http://www.springerlink.com/content/l69w054091n24j14/?p=d517b9e40b344f9bb3fc19ee23a823b3&pi=4.
^ Kozynchenko A. (2005) The role of retarded momentum and spin in explaining the Meissner effect and other electrodynamic phenomena, Apeiron 12(3): 330-350.
M. Tinkham, Introduction to Superconductivity, 2nd Ed., Dover Books on Physics (2004). ISBN 0-486-43503-2 (Paperback). A good technical reference.
Fritz London, Superfluids, Volume I, Macroscopic Theory of Superconductivity, (1950). Reprinted by Dover. ISBN 0-486-60044-0. By the man who explained the Meissner effect. Pp.34-37 gives a technical discussion of the Meissner effect for a superconducting sphere.
Wayne M. Saslow, Electricity, Magnetism, and Light, Academic (2002). ISBN 0-12-619455-6. pp.486-489 gives a simple mathematical discussion of the surface currents responsible for the Meissner effect, in the case of a long magnet levitated above a superconducting plane.
External links
Wikimedia Commons has media related to: Meissner effect
Maglev Trains Audio slideshow from the National High Magnetic Field Laboratory discusses magnetic levitation, the Meissner Effect, magnetic flux trapping and superconductivity
Video about Type I Superconductors: R=0/Transition temperatures/B is a state variable/Meissner effect/Energy gap (Giaever)/BCS model
Meissner Effect (Hyperphysics)
A video demonstrating the Meissner Effect
Categories: Levitation | Magnetism | Superconductivity
We are high quality suppliers, our products such as CPR-1000 Current Probe Reader manufacturer , china CRS-TESTER for oversee buyer. To know more, please visits repair test equipment suppliers.
Processing your request, Please wait....
